Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Spotlight on ... Michael Butor's 'Degrees' (1960)

----


'All the maps you have are of no use, all this work of discovery and surveying; you have to start off at random, like the first men on earth; you risk dying of hunger a few miles from the richest stores.' -- Michel Butor, Degrees


____________
'Michel Butor (1926 - ) came to prominence in the 1950s with his novels Passage de Milan (1954) and La Modification (1957). Like Robbe-Grillet, Sarraute, Simon and other writers of the new novelists, he refused to follow traditional concepts of plot and characterization. Instead of describing reality these writers have questioned our usual way of seeing reality. In L'Emploi du temps (1959, Passing Time) the protagonist, Jacques Revel, tries to find sense of the streets and buildings of a strange city, but feels that he is imprisoned within a loom. He has come to work in an English town called Bleston. He wanders disorientated along rows of houses or passes on a bus the building he left just half an hour ago. "...little by little I came to feel that my bad luck was due to some malevolent will and that all these offers were so many lies, and I had to struggle increasingly against the impression that all my efforts were foredoomed to failure, that I was going round and round a blank wall, that the doors were sham doors and the people dummies, the whole thing a hoax."

'Butor's best-known novel, La Modification, is a story inside story, told throughout in the second person plural. The narrator talks to himself during a train journey from Paris to Rome, before eventually deciding that he will not leave his wife for his mistress. Instead, he elects to write a book that will become La Modification. Again in the following books, Le génie du lieu (1958), Degrés (1960), and Répertoire I (1960) the author attempts to exercise readers' perception of the world.' -- kirjasto.sci.fi


____________

Michel Butor/Auteurs TV (19:49)


A portrait of Michel Butor (2:35)



Prieuré de St Côme : Les livres pauvres de Michel Butor (1:49)


_____________
Michel Butor @ Britannica Online
Michel Butor's books @ Powells.com
Michel Butor interviewed by Anna Otten
About Pierre Coulibeuf's film 'Michel Butor, mobile' (2000)
Barbara Mason's 'Michel Butor: A Checklist
Re: Michel Butor @ Vertigo: Collecting & Reading W.G. Sebald
About Elinor S. Miller's 'Prisms and Rainbows: Michel Butor's Collaborations'
Richard Kostelanetz on Michel Butor's 'Mobile in America'


'On Tuesday, October 12, 1954, Pierre Vernier, a teacher in a Paris lycée, begins setting down an account that is to be a complete record of the life lived by himself, his students, and his fellow teachers. He begins by meticulously recording what he already knows of his students, their relationships to one another, and the books they're studying. Then he's forced to enlist his nephew—who's in his class—to report on the private lives of the other boys. To record all reality, he must know all that has passed, is passing, and will pass through his pupils' minds.

'Degrees is an extraordinary novel exposing one man's obsessive project, the impossibility of its completion, and the damaging effect this obsession has on both Vernier and those who surround him.' -- Dalkey Archive



Excerpt:

I walk into the classroom, and I step up onto the platform.

When the bell stops ringing, I take out a briefcase I have just laid on the desk the alphabetical list of students and the other sheet of white paper, on which they themselves have indicated their seats in this classroom.

Then I sit down, and when all the talking has stopped, I begin to call the roll:

“Abel, Aremelli, Baron . . .”,

trying to fix their faces in my memory, for I don’t know how to recognize them yet, except the ones who were with me last year, you in particular, Pierre,

who raise your brown eyes when I come up to your name,

after “. . . Daval, de Joigny, de Loups”,

before going on to “Estier, Fage Jean-Claude, Fage Henri . . .”,

giving me a smile I don’t want to answer, because it’s obviously better if as many of your classmates as possible were unaware for as long as possible that we’re related, so that in their eyes you’re the same to me as many of them.

Your uncle Henri Jouret, on the other side of the wall behind me, is coping with his senior French students, calling the role, trying to get their seats and faces straight before going to the questions and the analysis of a page of Saint-Simon.


I have already been in this classroom with you. It was our second geography lesson.

“Zola, what can you tell me about the atmosphere?”

“Wolf, what do you know about the internal structure of this planet?”

“And now, Voss, go to the blackboard and tell me about the history of the earth and its principal geological ages.”

While he was standing there thinking up his answers, his hands behind his back, I was watching you out of one eye. The sun fell on your black hair, and on your hands with their bitten nails; your shadow spread over the book you were looking at, you spent a long time over a rather blurred photograph of the Grand Canyon that had a black spot in the middle, so heavy and irregular it looked as if you had made it yourself;

and your Uncle Henri was already on the other side of the wall behind me, with his senior French students, asking one of pupils to begin with the death of Monseigneur, Dauphin of France:


“I found all Versailles gathered there . . .”

frowning when he corrected mistakes, tapping his pencil point on the yellow wood of the desk that like my own was already pitted with little dents, the same way he corrected your mistakes last hour, after collecting your first French compositions on this ultraclassical subject:

“Describe the one day of your vacation that has left the strongest impression in your memory; try to explain why it was this day that seems most memorable.”

He questioned some of you about Rabelais’ life and works, asked for a volunteer to explain Gargantua’s letter to Pantagruel, and selected you from among those who raised their hands, saying in a tone of voice he wanted to sound particularly severe, without looking at you:

“All right, Eller, show us what you know.”

You wondered if you were supposed to read the paragraph in small type, where the editor provided some information about the nature and content of the selection:

asterisk, “having become a student, Pantagruel attends the various French universities . . .”,

or else:

triangle, “Most of the chapters devoted to Pantagruel’s studies. . .”,

or else:

circle, “A more elaborate program will be found in Gargantua; here is the wit itself. . .”,

but suddenly, just as you were going to ask your question, you found yourself facing this uncle, and you stopped, disturbed, no longer sure how to address him, realizing you would have to say “Monsieur” and not be able to, blushing, looking down, rushing through your reading most wildly, pronouncing the words indistinctly, disregarding the punctuation:


“Now it is the minds of men are qualified with all manner of discipline, and the old sciences revised, which for many ages were extinct: now it is that the learned languages are to their Sistine purity restored . . .”


“Eller, please pay attention to the text; start that sentence over again.”

“Now it is that the minds of men . . .”

“That’s better.”

“Are qualified with all manner of discipline, and the old sciences revived, which for many ages were extinct: now it is that the learned languages are to their pristine purity restored . . .”

“Go on.”

“Viz., Greek, without which a man may be ashamed to fall . . .”

“To what?”

“To call himself a scholar, Hebrew, Arabic, Chaldean and Latin. Printing likewise is now abused . . .”

“Careful!”

“Is now in use, so elegant, and so correct . . .”

In the classroom directly underneath, I was explaining to your seventh-grade schoolmates, in front of the map of ancient Egypt that one of them had brought in from the superintendent’s office,

that we knew the ancient civilization of this country from the monuments it had left, pyramids, hypogea, mastabas, obelisks like the one in the Place de la Concorde,

how Champollion had managed to decipher the hieroglyphics thanks to the Rosetta Stone (Rosetta was a city), now in the British Museum in London, immediately extending our history several thousand years back into time,

how the pharaoh of the first dynasty, Menes, had combined the crowns of Upper and Lower Egypt, of the valley and the delta, the red and the white, the vulture and the kite,

how this long series of kings and conversions was divided into three chief periods, the Old, the Middle and the New Kingdom,

before coming upstairs to meet your class here,

where I continue calling the roll:

“Jourdan? Absent too? Oh, no, there you are. Speak up! What were you dreaming about? Knorr?”

(he was absent yesterday too),

“He hasn’t come back? All right. Limours?”

“Here.”

“Mouron?”

Sitting in front of you in the first row, Limours casually arranges on his desk his spiral-bound notebook and his second hand history book, on the first page of which he carefully crosses out the former owner’s name with his ballpoint pen, in order to write his own,

he too a pupil, this year, of one of his uncles, Monsieur Bailly, who at this moment is making his seniors on the floor above read Keats’s sonnet “On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer”

(Chapman: 1559-1634):


“ . . . Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
When a new planet swims into his ken;
Or like a stout Cortez”


(Cortez, or Cortes: 1485-1547),


“when with eagle eyes
he star’d at the Pacific—and all his men
Look’d at each other with a wild surmise—
Silent, upon a peak in Darien.”


(Darien: southernmost part of the isthmus of Panama),

a first cousin of both Monsieur Mouron, father of Alain Mouron who is in this class, and of Madame Daval siting to your right, who is leaning over to ask you for a blotter, because his ink bottle, badly corked, has begun to leak all over his hands.
----
Hey. I'm a little improved. Actually, I can stand fairly upright and walk a reasonable distance without grabbing onto a wall and screaming, which is huge, but everything is still pretty difficult to do, and I'm woozy-ish from painkillers. All that said, I'd never been to an osteopath before, and now I'm definitely onboard with how magic that practice is. So I guess the improvement over the last 24 hours is significant enough. The hardest, most painful thing at the moment is sitting, but I'm going to try to get back on track today and catch up, albeit quickly and rather feebly, I'm positive, with the comments from the weekend and yesterday. As for the reason I'm here in Belfort, I'll just say that, my impairment notwithstanding, the rehearsals for the new theater piece are going very well so far. We've roughed out two of the piece's main and most important sections, and today we're going to try out a third one. Stephen was up all last night working on parts of the score, and we'll start working with them today. The main problem so far has been the holograms, which aren't working well yet and still have the problematic look and quality of video projections, so we're experimenting with different techniques, kinds of screens, etc., and we might have to rethink that aspect of the piece altogether. We're committed to doing a public presentation of the work in progress on Wednesday night, so we're trying to finesse what that will be. Anyway, I'm documenting the rehearsals with my camera as best I can, and I'll post the results on Friday so those who are interested can see what I'm talking about more clearly. All right, I'm going to speed through the comments now because the pain of sitting is already starting to distract and bother me. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hey. Oh, yeah, the reissue of that Serge Gainsbourg album really should have been in my list too. Thanks a lot for the list. ** Bacteriaburger, Wow, long time indeed. You good? What are you working on? Anything new we can see? ** Put The Lotion In The Basket, Hey, Nick. Listen, discovering your work has definitely been a huge highlight of the year, a 'counting one's lucky stars' kind of thing. That stupid comment you got is pretty funny. My stuff used to get the exact same reaction, except with William Burroughs' name instead. Someday your name will be in that sentence too when it's applied to some future young 'edgy' writer. People can be so dumb when they're intimidated. ** Magick Mike, Hey, man. What a pleasure. Great list. I noted the stuff I don't know. On the 'Frisk' film, yeah, that's me making a cameo walking down the hall. The letter to Marcus Hu was a statement I asked him to read at the film's premiere, at which point that ending you mentioned wasn't included yet. My issues with that film are vast and go far beyond the real or not thing. That was just a compromise: if Marcus had read my statement re: the ending, I would have kept my problems with the film to myself, but he didn't read it as he had promised to do, and then Todd Verow gave an interview where he talked about how hard it had been to make a film based on a novel that was such a pretentious, badly written piece of shit, and that was that, which even isn't what you asked me. Blame pain and its killers. ** I have to speed up now and stop interacting so much or I'll never get through this, sorry. ** Pisycaca, Hey, great, I can't wait to see you guys! ** Stephen Elliott, Hey, Stephen! Its an honor to have you here. I need to check out that Eggers. Sorry for the brevity, but thanks a lot for commenting. Respect. ** SYpHA_69, Hope you're feeling a lot better by now. I was slipped an mp3 of the Consumer Electronics album, and I understand it's out there somewhere to be found and grabbed. ** Bill, I don't know most of the things on your list. I will. Thanks. ** Mark Gluth, Hey, M. Thanks a lot. ** Heliotrope, Oh, fuck, RIP indeed. I hadn't heard that. Sad, very sad. ** Darby, Hey, welcome. I like both. BSC should have been in my list too, actually. ** Steevee, Thanks for the list, and, yeah, sounds like a clean break is the way to go on that critic jerk. Fingers crossed and very nice initial news re: the Polish guy. ** Alexander, Hey. Welcome to here. I don't know 'Waste'. I'll check it out. Thank you. ** Reynard, Hey. Wow, an awesome amount of new people today. Thanks. Yeah, I try to keep my oldness purely technical. It's pretty easy to do, so I don't know what all the boring older guys' excuses are. Oh, I liked that Chelsea Martin book too. I forgot about it when doing the list. Yeah, that was really good. Thanks for coming by. ** Colin, Hey, Colin. How are you? What's been happening? How's the writing on all fronts going? Really nice to see you. ** Jesse Hudson, Hey, buddy. Everything's either fuzzy or jolting today. Strange sensation. Talk to you later. ** David Ehrenstein, I have to read that 'Anal Retentive whatever' story, it sounds good, ha ha. Thank you, sir. ** Ken Baumann, Hey, Ken. Yeah, I think Shane Jones is sending me his novel. I can't wait. And you mentioned 'Waste' too. Okay, I'm going to get that as soon as I'm enclosed in Paris again. I'll hope to give a more lucid update on the theater stuff tomorrow. I'm still vagued out by painkillers and interrupted by stabs of heavy discomfort this morning. Take care, K. ** JW Veldhoen, I'll hold you to that, naturally. ** Adam, Hey, Adam, welcome. I wish I were able to be a better host today, but that 'hey' was a linguistic glass of champagne, if you didn't notice. I want to see Ponytail live. And Religious Girls too. Thanks. ** Rigby, Those were, like, the perfect comments for my exactly inexact state at the moment. Top Ten, easily. ** Kiddiepunk, Cool, man. ** Joshua Caleb Weibley, Hey. Very cool of you grace my place. Yeah, I'm all torn in half about the Blur reunion. If Coxon hadn't been in such good shape music-wise of late, I think I'd roll my eyes. Agree on the MSP and on Wavves too, come to think of it. Nice. Yeah, thanks a lot. ** Tfcinnyc, Wow, all you new guys ... this is cool. I'm not normally such a mealy mouthed space case. Such bad timing. Blah blah blah ... oh, I haven't read the Lisa Jarnot book entirely, but I have read either a piece of it or something else by her, and, yeah, it was really terrific! Good call. I'm gonna get that. Thanks a lot. ** Oscar B, Hey. Thanks, pal. Any year is good for Rites of Spring. Cool, cool. ** Wolf, Howdy, Wolf. I'm fucked in the head and lower back today and getting more fucked by the minute. Still, you ever get osteopathy done on you? Man, it's pretty special. ** Alan, Ha ha ha, what? That was complicated when you're on painkillers. In a confusingly good way. ** I'm starting to feel too much pain. I have to move even faster. I'm sorry. ** David, Gracias. ** Bernard Welt, ... saves the day. ** Mark, Wow, nice. ** Alexandre, Dude, hey, what's the haps? I'm in Belfort. You ever been here? I'm in pain. You ever been in pain? It sucks in a very uninteresting way. When am I going to see you? ** Chilly Jay Chill, Hey, man. I'm going to have to go back and read your list later on or tomorrow or something because I'm losing my grace period. ** Tonio k, Hey, pal. I owe you an email, which I'l write to you soon, but thank you so much for what you sent, and I'm going to use it proudly and very gratefully. ** Thomas Moronic, My extreme pleasure, man. ** NB, Excellent add on the FB add by that tattoo guy. Are your fellow NYT employees giving a going away cupcake? ** The Dreadful Flying Glove, Like with Chilly Jay Chill, I've lost the ability to process a comment as rich with suggestions as yours for the moment, so a raincheck. Thank you. ** Distimium, Hey, my friend. Do I understand you correctly that you're doing a Buenos Aires Day for my blog? If so, wow, thank you, and if I misunderstood, I apologize. Pain's effect on thinking is really weird. ** Fanny burney, Oh, thank you so much about the Chris Lemmerhirt post and the posts like that. That means a lot. Oh, on your poems, well, I'm too fucked up by pain and its killers to give you any good suggestions this morning, which sucks. You could show me your poems first, and I could read them and ... what's it called ... vet (vett?) them? Anything I can do to help, I will. ** Steven Vineis, Hey, man. I'll try to check out 'Black Sabbatical'. Thanks. Sorry to be quick ... I'm seriously getting eaten by pain now. ** Inthemostpeculiarway, Hi, man. I'm out of it. I'm crawling to the finish line now. That said, I don't like you not having someone to talk to. Is that Valentine guy worth this? I don't know. Best, best, best to you, and I'll hope to be lucid tomorrow. ** Blake Butler, Hey! I'm totally like you on the Gaspar Noe. I'm losing my shit waiting to see it. Last I heard, I think it'll open in France in ... early August? ** Misanthrope, Too much pain now. Can't get the stuff in your stuff. Sorry, sorry. Must finish this. Love you, dude. ** Winter Rates, Thanks, hey, sorry. ** Nick Hudson, Don't know about the phone thing. If I get a signal, I guess so. We'll figure it out. I'm all about Messian's (sp?) organ music at the moment. ** David, Hey. ** Okay, I had planned to respond to the comments from yesterday too, but I just can't. When I looked at them yesterday in the early evening, which was the last time I looked, they were full of good wishes and kindness, and so I'll thank you all collectively, okay? If someone said or asked me something in particular, can you post it again today so I'll see it and respond tomorrow? Thank you. Very sorry for this crappy p.s., but I wanted to get things restarted here, and I'll surely be more with it and a more attentive friend tomorrow. What's the post today ... oh, yeah, Michel Butor. Very interesting writer. Hope the Day interests some of you. Thanks for your patience, everyone. Things will be more normalized by tomorrow, I'm pretty certain. Mark my words. Bye.